KADAR AIR, pH, SUHU, DAN KADAR AMONIA PADA LITTER DI DUA ZONASI YANG BERBEDA PADA KANDANG CLOSED HOUSE

(Studi Kasus di Closed house Jurusan Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Lampung)

  • Cakra Rakasiwi Mega Jaya Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung
  • RR Riyanti Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Lampung
  • Dian Septinova Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Lampung
  • Khaira Nova Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Lampung
Keywords: Ammonia, Closed-house zoning, Litter temperature, pH, Water content

Abstract

This research was a case study which aimed to determine the water content, ammonia content, pH, and temperature of litter in the zonation in the closed house. This research was carried out in March 2021-April 2021, for 28 days in the Closed-house unit of the Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung. The closed house unit used was 40 meters long and 8 meters wide with a capacity of 5,495 broiler DOCs. The closed house zone was divided into two, namely zone 1 (20x8m) located near the cooling pad occupied by 2,747 DOCs and in zone 2 (20x8m) which is near the exhaust fan occupied by 2,748 DOCs. The results showed that Zone 1 near the cooling pad had lower water content, ammonia, pH, and litter temperature compared to Zone 2 which was close to the exhaust fan.

 

 Keywords: Ammonia, Closed-house zoning, Litter temperature, pH, Water content

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. rata-rata konsumsi per kapita seminggu beberapa macam bahan makanan penting. https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2014/09/08/950/rata-rata-konsumsi-per-kapita-seminggu-beberapa-macam-bahan-makanan-penting-2007-2018.htm. Diakses tanggal 08 agustus 2019 pada pukul 21:22
Cobb. 2010. Manajemen Broiler Guide, Cobb-Vantress Inc. Siloam Springs Arkansas 72761, US. Oyster House, Severalls Lane, Colchester Essex CO4 9PD, UK, Rodovia Assis Chateau briand, Km 10 Guapiaçu SP Brasil, Pearl Drive Ortigas Center, Pasig City Philippines
Charles, D. R. 2002. Responses to the thermal environment. In Poultry Environment Problem, A guide to solution. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, United King-dom.
Dewanti, A. C. 2014. Pengaruh Berbagai Jenis Bahan Litter terhadap Respon Fisiologis Broiler Fase Finisher di Closed House. Skirpsi. Jurusan Peternakan Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Lampung. Bandar Lampung.
Fadilah, R. 2005. Ayam Broiler Komersial. Agromedia Pustaka. Jakarta
Kartasudjana, R. dan E. Suprijatna. 2010. Manajemen Ternak Unggas. Cetakan Kedua, Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Metasari, I., et al. (2013). Analisis Usaha Pada Peternakan Rakyat Ayam Petelur di Kecamatan Srengat Kabupaten Blitar. Jurnal Agroveteriner. Vol. 2 No. 1 Desember 2013
North M.O. dan Bell D.D. 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual. 4 th Edition. Van Northland Reinhold. Newv York.
Rasyaf, M. 1995. beternak Ayam Pedaging Jakartra: Penebar Swadaya.
Ritz, C. W, B. D. Fairchild, & M. P. Lacy. 2004. Implications of ammonias production and emissions from commercial poultry facilities: a review. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 13 : 684-692.
Sujana, E., S. Darana, dan L. Setiawan. 2011. Implementasi teknologi semi closed – house system pada perfor-man ayam broiler di test farm sus-tainable livestock techno park, kampus Fakultas Peternakan Uni-versitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor
Suprijatna, E., U. Atmomarsono, dan R. Kartasujadna. 2005. Ilmu Dasar Ternak Unggas. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta.
Weaver Jr., W.D. 2001. Poultry Housing. In: Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production, 5 th Edition, (Ed. Donald D. Bell and William D. Weafer Jr.).pp.102-103
Zuprizal. 2009. Menyiasati Bau Tak Sedap dari Kandang. Trobos Edisi 257
Published
2022-05-01
How to Cite
Jaya, C., Riyanti, R., Septinova, D., & Nova, K. (2022). KADAR AIR, pH, SUHU, DAN KADAR AMONIA PADA LITTER DI DUA ZONASI YANG BERBEDA PADA KANDANG CLOSED HOUSE. Jurnal Riset Dan Inovasi Peternakan (Journal of Research and Innovation of Animals), 6(2), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.23960/jrip.2022.6.2.129-135